Optimal decisions on pricing and greening policies of multiple manufacturers under governmental regulations on greening and carbon emission

  • Manoranjan De Department of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
  • Bibhas Chandra Giri Department of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Keywords: Green product, Carbon emission, Substitute product, Duopoly firm, Government regulations

Abstract

This paper is determines the optimal decisions on pricing and greening strategies of substitutable products which are manufactured by duopoly competitor firms in a consumer sensitive market where a consumer can choose a particular product by its retail price and greening level. The firms simultaneously produce these substitute products under carbon emission regulations enacted by government administration. Government’s carbon emission regulation like carbon tax or cap and trade may not be enough to direct optimization of social greening welfare but may force to mandate the firms to satisfy a standard greening level to handle it. A penalty or subsidy is levied per unit difference in greening standards as well as with the cape and trade regulation on carbon emission. The, contesting firm managers face the problem of fixing the conflicts on carbon penalty and greening investment to decide the optimum policies. For numerical examples, the optimal decisions of the firm managers are obtained by maximizing the profit following government’s mandatory regulations. Some managerial insights are outlined and sensitivity analyses on key parameters of the model are graphically presented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blackwell, R. (2015). Canada dims the light on the incandescent light bulb. The Globe and Mail.

Chen, C. (2001). Design for the environment: A quality-based model for green product development. Management Science, 47(2), 239–25.

De, M., Das, B., & Maiti, M. (2016). EPL models for complementary and substitute items under imperfect production process with promotional cost and selling price dependent demands. Opsearch, 53(2), 259–277.

De, M., Das, B., & Maiti, M. (2018). Quality and pricing decisions for substitutable items under imperfect production process over a random planning horizon, Hacettepe. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 47(1), 175–201.

Ghosh, D., & Shah, J. (2012). A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 568–583.

Ghosh, D., Shah, J., & Swami, S. (2018). Product greening and pricing strategies of firms under green sensitive consumer demand and environmental regulations. Annals of Operations Research, 1, 1–30.

Gouda, S. K., Jonnalagedda, S. & Saranga, H. (2016). Design for the environment: Impact of regulatory policies on product development. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 558–570.

Hafezi, M., & Zolfagharinia, H. (2018). Green product development and

environmental performance: Investigating the role of government regulations. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 395–410.

He, P., Zhang, W., Xu, X., & Bian, Y. (2015). Production lot-sizing and carbon emissions under cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 241–248.

Hua, Z., Zhang, X., & Xu, X. (2011). Product design strategies in a manufacturer–retailer distribution channel. Omega, 39(1), 23–32.

Krass, D., Nedorezov, T., & Ovchinnikov, A. (2013). Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Production and Operations Management, 22(5), 1035–1055.

Krommyda, I., Skouri, K., & Konstantaras, I. (2015). Optimal ordering quantities for substitutable pro ducts with stock-dependent demand. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39(1), 147–164.

Li, B., Zhu, M., Jiang, Y., & Li, Z. (2016). Pricing policies of a competitive dual-channel green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2029–2042.

Maity, K., & Maiti, M. (2009). Optimal inventory policies for deteriorating complementary and substitute items. International Journal of Systems Science, 40(3), 267–276.

Mhofu, S. (2017). Zimbabwe bans plastic foam containers to protect environment. https://www.voanews.com/a/zimbabwe-ban-plasticfoam/3945349.html

Pan, Q. H., He, X., Skouri, K., Chen, S. C., & Teng, J. T. (2018). An inventory replenishment system with two inventory-based substitutable products. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 135–147.

Savaskan, R. C., Bhattacharya, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004). Closed loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Science, 50(2), 239–252.

Sun, J. (2012). Analyses of green products in duopoly market on the base of environment quality model. International Journal of Computer and Communication Engineering, 1(1), 22.

Swami, S., & Shah, J. (2013). Channel coordination in green supply chain

management. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(3), 336–351.

Yang, D., & Xiao, T. (2017). Pricing and green level decisions of a green supply chain with governmental interventions under fuzzy uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 1174–1187.

Zhang, B., & Xu, L. (2013). Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(1), 118–127.

Zhang, X., Xu, X., & He, P. (2012). New product design strategies with subsidy policies. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 21(3), 356–371.

Published
2019-06-27
How to Cite
De, M., & Giri, B. (2019). Optimal decisions on pricing and greening policies of multiple manufacturers under governmental regulations on greening and carbon emission. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1-2). Retrieved from http://www.dmame.org/index.php/dmame/article/view/46